The spinrite[0] user group has noticed some of these effects, even on in-service drives.
The theory is that operating system files, which rarely change, are written and almost never re-written. So the charges begin to decay over time and while they might not be unreadable, reads for these blocks require additional error correction, which reduces performance.
There have been a significant number of (anecdotal) reports that a full rewrite of the drive, which does put wear on the cells, greatly increases the overall performance. I haven't personally experienced this yet, but I do think a "every other year" refresh of data on SSDs makes sense.
> The team explained that other platforms moved ahead. Safari supports JPEG XL, and Windows 11 users can add native support through an image extension from Microsoft Store. The format is also confirmed for use in PDF documents.
glad those folks didn't listen to "the format is dead since the biggest browser doesn't support it" (and shame on Firefox for not doing the same)
"Given that The Paris Review portrayed itself as studiously apolitical—recall William Styron’s famous anti-manifesto in the first issue, fashioning it as a home for “the non-drumbeaters and non-axe-grinders”—Matthiessen’s CIA involvement has raised questions and eyebrows since its revelation in the seventies."
This is actually a bit of a tell, because the best way to make ideology palatable is to make it seem like common sense (which is easy if that ideology is already in power). As zizek said, it is when you believe you have stepped outside ideology that you are most fully ensnared by it.
A lot of people think, "I am not ideological, I just use common sense, I am apolitical." Sorry but this is a game you must play whether you want to or not- trying to avoid making a choice is still making a choice.
Its like with fashion, for example- you may think that by wearing khaki shorts and sandals with socks that you are avoiding making fashion choices, but what is actually happening is that you are simply making very bad fashion choices.
I rather think that one of the psychological principles beneath authoritarianism is that making choices requires effort, and so people try to avoid it, and the easiest way to do that is by copying whatever everyone else is doing. When a person in this mode sees other people doing things that are different or unusual or out of place, they are reminded that in fact they have free will, and that other choices were always possible, and that is a disturbing and uncomfortable thought.
Miele, Bosch, and Speed Queen do the old-school engineering based on failure analysis and have basically the same reliability as the super-simple machines from the 70s and 80s, so 20 years is a common lifespan with outliers in the 30- and 40-year range. If you adjust for inflation, you find that the super-simple machines from the 70s and 80s cost basically the same as machines from these more expensive brands, so if you care about filling landfills with broken appliances, you should probably consider purchasing them and supporting the business model.
No one would make cost-engineered stuff that fails just outside the warranty if people didn't buy it.
I guess it's a matter of habit, but after so many years of laptop keyboards everything else feels weird/wrong. I've tried mechanical keyboards (for about half ayear) .. and it always felt like using some antique typewriter b/c of the key travel
If I need a detached keyboard then the only one that feels normal is the Apple Magickeyboard b/c it's exactly like a laptop and clicky (the logitech equivalents are very mushy). Wish there was one with standard/Windows keys
From my notes. Maybe it's useful to someone. Not comprehensive as there are other brands and other iterations I'm sure. Many dpreview.com sample galleries show original filenames. Some forums list filenames, youtube descriptions can list model names, pdf manuals and manufacturer websites sometimes list the names. There isn't really a good list of these that I know of.
> If you can't attract an audience for your art, does it deserve funding? How do we decide that? Can anyone just make a papier-mache turd and get funding for it? If not, then who decides what is worth funding? On what basis? How do we stop nepotism and elitism from being the main factors for arts funding?
Paper mache turds are gauche. Real artists produce works that are extensions of themselves, capturing the very essence of their being. The texture should be genuine and the scent unmistakably original, challenging conventional aesthetics. True art requires a visceral connection formed through a process of personal evacuation. It's about creating something so authentic viewers can practically taste the artist's commitment.
I wonder if there is a name for the phenomenon where people do something that leads to negative consequences but they technically "did everything right". I have a friend who crosses the street without looking both ways and his argument is that if a car hits him "they're in the wrong", as if an accident doesn't occur that way.
I've been writing C++ for well over 30 years. I'm currently employed full-time maintaining the C++ toolchain, runtime, and standard libraries for a major commercial embedded OS. I see a lot of C++17 being used by my customers every day. It's there, running everything around you.
C++20 is still too fresh for my industry, especially for embedded where runtimes require certification for functional safety. Maybe in two years.
What can I tell The Committee? Stop. No, we don't need a single central ex cathedra library for networking. Or graphics. Or SIMD. Even the existing filesystem library is so broken it's dangerous (the standard specifies if it's used on an actual filesystem it's undefined behaviour -- which means using <filesystem> means your program could provoke the legendary nasal daemons just by being run). Stick to generic basics and leave the specialized stuff that not everyone needs to third-party libaries. Nothing wrong with a marketplace of libraries to serve an entire economy of requirements.
You're failing on URLs that don't have HTTPS... that's awkward. I should be able to type any site and have it be smart enough to go to the URL and scan against the resolved URL. Like type in "blizzard.com" and have it load "https://www.blizzard.com/en-us/" for me.
Nice to see Discord and WhatsApp I guess, but what about LinkedIn, what about Pinterest. Or Slack (should be the same as Discord).
You don't include what to fix. Check out how socialsharepreview.com does it.
It has a bunch of helpful tips on what to fix to make your content unfurl correctly. Really useful for the marketing crowd that loves this stuff. These sites all use different formats, different character counts... It's good to share information about what to fix. Twitter cards, vs. Open Graph metadata, for example. (I didn't check but it'd be good to make sure you're loading the right ones for the right site.)
It seems to me that google should not allow a site to serve different content to their bot than they serve to their users. If the content is unavailable to me, it should not be in the search results.
It obviously doesn't seem that way to Google, or to the sites providing the content.
They are doing what works for them without ethical constraints (Google definitely, many content providers, eg NYT). Is it fair game to do what works for you (eg. 13ft)?!
Upvote! I tried Mac Terminal, iTerm2, Kitty, Warp, etc etc, and settled with WezTerm. Easy to configure, fast, looks nice. I created a theme for it too:
> What's your opinion of John Oliver? I just watched a YouTube video of his show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqK3_n6pdDY. It seemed pretty good, but I'm also very ignorant.
"Between the years 1939 and 1945 more than 6,000,000 Jews died amid a global surge of fatal diseases." is roughly the level of factual accuracy in that specific episode.
In general, I think even without familiarity of the topics discussed it is easy to see how in every episode John Oliver cherry-picks statistics, presents the opinions of individuals as facts or as widely held opinions and slathers the whole show in adjectives so you know exactly what is the correct opinion you are supposed to hold.
I quite enjoy the show as entertainment, but I would not turn to it as a source of truth or to become better informed about a topic.
Reminds me of what they say about composer Johann Sebastian Mastropiero:
« Whenever -due to economic necessity- Mastropiero was forced to compose music by request or commission, produced mediocre and inexpressive works. On the contrary, when he only obeyed his inspiration, he never wrote a note. »
This kinda reminds me of a feature Windows (Phone) used to have, where it would share your Wi-Fi password with the device's contacts automatically. To opt-out you had to add _optout to the SSID name. https://www.theregister.com/2015/06/30/windows_10_wi_fi_sens...
It looks like this feature was removed eventually, but it's just one of those tasteless things that MS does every once in a while.
It also fits into the larger societal trend of horribly underserving Zoomer and Alpha (maybe young Millennials too) young boys and men.
I've heard someone put it very succinctly: people like Andrew Tate are asking the right questions, but giving abominable answers.
I can drop some very simple statistics: women have been getting more bachelors degrees since the 80s. Most university gender ratios are 40/60 trending towards 30/70 [correction: 35/65]. And in the 20s-30s age bracket women have been outearning men. Yet all you see in high school is pushes for more women to attend university, posters, massive amounts of female-only scholarships. Or in terms of wage, constant talk of closing the gender wage gap for women. Etc. etc.
Its being talked about as an issue more and more, but it took more than 40 years for it being okay to speak of.
You really shouldn't start a PhD without doing the PhD simulator first [0]. Sadly, people who haven't yet been through the PhD experience think that this game is exaggerating for comic effect. It really isn't.
Happy to answer any questions