Yes, because leading "This" is such a classic flamebait trope. I've reworded it to avoid that and be a little bit clearer. Thanks to both of you!
If someone suggests a better title (more accurate and neutral, preferably using representative language from the article itself), we can change it again.
How about "A bestiary for 5th Edition D&D that ..." etc?
"Bestiary" is used in the article and it should be recognisable by people who play D&D or not. The "for" makes it clear it's not by the publishers of D&D.
If someone suggests a better title (more accurate and neutral, preferably using representative language from the article itself), we can change it again.