I’m not sure how the first part of your comment is related. I was referring to the potential defying of Trump’s orders by CDC employees (the topic).
The main point was about “anti-democratic” which again only makes sense if you know that it is the public’s will that e.g. the CDC data is dismantled (the topic). You still haven’t given a convincing argument that that is true, other than “I think approximately 0%..” Do you have anything more substantial than “I think”, because _I think_ millions of voters voted vaguely on “the economy” and “immigration” and don’t en-masse support something like “less CDC data”.
You’re saying he’s “defying the law.” My point is that I’m sure he has legal eggheads invoking aggressive interpretations of the law, like every administration does.
Regarding the second point, one of Trump’s main pitches was to revert the use of progressive social theories and terminology in government. Of course it’s going to take some time to clean up the web pages.
The main point was about “anti-democratic” which again only makes sense if you know that it is the public’s will that e.g. the CDC data is dismantled (the topic). You still haven’t given a convincing argument that that is true, other than “I think approximately 0%..” Do you have anything more substantial than “I think”, because _I think_ millions of voters voted vaguely on “the economy” and “immigration” and don’t en-masse support something like “less CDC data”.