Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 2OEH8eoCRo0's commentslogin

Is the EFF captured? This is a resource against misguided laws but what's a law they'd actually approve of? This entire resource is boring defense of the status quo.

It will be interesting to see how this pans out. I think many in tech are afraid that this will lead to a positive outcome.

I'm afraid that this will lead to no change to the issues it purports to fix, and then we'll... do nothing with that information.

Really, I think most people in tech generally believe that getting teens of social media will be a positive thing. The question is how to go about it.

It's understandable, to some extend, that people will protest government interference, but it's also an industry that have repeatedly show itself to be incapable of regulation itself. I don't really see the big surprise, most government are relatively hands of, until you prove that you're incapable of regulating yourself. Most regulation happens after the damage is done.

I do think that 16 is a bit low, I'd like to have seen it be 18, or a complete ban on algorithmically generated feeds (I believe the latter would be the better option).


I think the need for hardware decoding stinks because it makes capable hardware obsolete since it can't decode new video.

Hardware acceleration has been a thing since...forever. Video in general is a balancing act between storage, bandwidth, and quality. Video playback on computers is a balancing act between storage, bandwidth, power, and cost.

Video is naturally large. You've got all the pixels in a frame, tens of frames every second, and however many bits per pixel. All those frames need to be decoded and displayed in order and within fixed time constraints. If you drop frames or deliver them slowly no one is happy watching the video.

If at any point you stick to video that can be effectively decoded on a general purpose CPU with no acceleration you're never going to keep up with the demands of actual users. It's also going to use a lot more power than an ASIC that is purpose-built to decode the video. If you decide to use the beefiest CPU in order to handle higher quality video under some power envelope your costs are going to increase making the whole venture untenable.


I hear you but I think the benefits fall mainly on streaming platforms rather than users.

Like I'm sure Netflix will lower their prices and Twitch will show fewer ads to pass the bandwidth savings onto us right?


Would anyone pay NetFlix any amount of money if they were using 1Mbps MPEG-1 that's trivially decoded on CPUs?

Further behind on what? The rape of their citizens by big tech?

We also pick all our other leaders directly.

It's impossible to experience nothing. Spooky

You’ll never know that you died

My friend is still on the Pixel 2. Are they affected?

Pixel 2 stopped getting updates almost 5 years ago

That doesn't answer the question.

There are two kinds of people:

1. Those who can extrapolate from incomplete information


Please, feel free to extrapolate for me whether the "unspecified vulnerability" referenced in the article was introduced more or less than five years ago.

The point was the whole phone has been vulnerable to a multitude of RCEs for five years, so it doesn't really matter if its the latest exploit, its a silly request.

What kernel version is it running?

I wanted to add an old paperwhite to a kubernetes cluster and the ancient kernel held me back.


Same for me. I wanted to use it for HPC...

How many Kindles to run a LLaMA 7B model?

Rossmann Calls it the "EULA Roofie."

Why didn't you read the EULA is like asking a roofie victim why didn't they have a chemist analyze their drink first.


fix anticheat!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: