Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more 2OEH8eoCRo0's commentslogin

What countries do you think these bad actors reside? Russia, China, Iran, and NK will wipe their ass with any law enforcement request.


Why would they chase a lower margin business area? Are they out of ideas?


More vertical integration


Like IBM?


Like IBM in the 1960s.


That's my non-expert belief as well. We are trying to brute force an approximation of one aspect of how neurons work at great cost.


Agree. It would be cool to populate my Valheim server with a bunch of agents that are in competition.


> The threat actor—whom we assess with high confidence was a Chinese state-sponsored group—manipulated our Claude Code tool into attempting infiltration into roughly thirty global targets and succeeded in a small number of cases.


So why do we never hear of US sponsored hackers attacking foreign businesses? Or Swedish cyber criminals? Does it never happen? Are “Chinese” hackers just the only ones getting the blame?


US, Israel, NK, China, Iran, and Russia are the countries you typically hear about hacking things.

Now when the US/Israel are attacking authoritarian countries they often don't publish anything about it as it would make the glorious leader look bad.

If EU is hacked by US I guess we use diplomatic back channels.


I don't think many other countries have that combination of "don't care if others know" approach and level of state sponsorships. China really seems to do some spray and pray attacking private companies too. Same for Russia and NK. Compared to that, for example the "equation group" from the US seems really restrained and targeted.

If the US groups for example started doing ransomware at scale in China, we'd know about that really soon from the news.


Stuxnet was very high profile but I think the incentives to go public and place blame are complicated.


How much news do you read in Chinese?

The US government has hacked things in China. That you have not heard of something is not evidence that it doesn't exist.

North Korea also does plenty of hacking around the world. That's how they get a significant portion of their government budget, and they rely on cryptocurrency to support that situation.

Ukraine and Russia are doing lots of official and vigilante hacking right now.

Back in the mid 2000s, there was a guy who called himself "the jester" who was vaguely right wing and spent his time hacking ISIS stuff. My college interviewed him.


Is it possible that you're biased and assume since China does this that the US also hacks private corporations?


It’s just that the CIA is so good at regime change, you would think they would also hack private companies if they needed to.


Battlefield 6, GTA V online, Escape From Tarkov, likely GTA VI

Imagine not supporting the latest releases that all your friends are playing.


Zero of my friends are playing any of these games. GTA VI will probably do the console first release thing anyways.

Edit: Fair enough to the other ones though. This comment wasnt meant to be inflammatory or argumentative, but clearly someone else believed it was.


What's the point of arguing like this? You're asking for experiences from people, then when people give you proper answers it glides off with "well no one I know plays those anyways". Isn't the discussion larger than your personal and private experiences, if you're discussing in public like this?

You seemed to have some initial claim that "all games actually work perfectly fine, prove me wrong" but then you don't seem to actually want to engage faithfully anyways.


HN wasn't letting me comment, then I forgot about this. I wasnt trying to be hostile, I didnt think about the comment coming off that when when I wrote it. I feel you were far to quick to assume bad faith, but either way I apologize that my comment came off as argumentative.

I certainly never said nobody plays those games. I was just responding to their statement about not playing the games your friends are playing.


They think HN is Reddit, notorious with its flaming war


Depends on your friend group; statistically speaking they're more like to play ARC raiders than EFT which does run on Linux


Steam Box 2 will be out before GTA VI


I'd be more worried about a supply chain attack with malicious devices.


What kind of supply chain attack can one mount with a disk?


A malicious device plugged into your machine? The only limit is your imagination.


Yep. Drive firmware is the attack vector, here, for anyone Googling or ChatGPT-ing along.


Will it be able to play AAA games with shitty DRM such as Battlefield 6?

Not being able to play these huge titles on Linux really sucks!


It is not a DRM problem, you can run many EA games on Linux with no problems, it is an anti cheat problem, which can not be solved by Valve, it has to be done by EA.


Correct but the customer doesn't care whose fault it is, they just want to play the latest games.


Valve making more devices to propogate Steam is a good thing. If they achieve critical mass, EA will then be pressured to implement a compatible solution.


Sure, it doesn't matter to the customer. But it matters if the problem is going to be solved.

Valve can not solve it. The only way it can be solved is if game studios create anti cheat software, which are effective and can be used within a Linux environment. This will only happen if companies see a profit motive to do this, which will happen if the market is large enough.


Look at it this way: Not having to play those money suckers leaves you more time for all the awesome indies out there!


Well that’s one of the big reasons why PC gaming on Windows will remain dominant for a very very long time and Linux-based PCs for gaming will always remain behind.

Majority of gamers really don’t care about indie games. (unless they are exceptional)


In meatspace you can take ownership of abandoned land if you maintain it for a time. It's called adverse possession.

Where is the SW equivalent? We should be able to gain ownership of abandoned software.


This is often misunderstood and varies by jurisdiction. Often called "squatter's rights", it is often thought to mean "if I use this land for a long time without anybody noticing it becomes mine", but e.g. in my jurisdiction, you also have to have prove that you didn't know it wasn't yours. For example, if your backyard fence has been 5 feet over the property line for 10 years and nobody noticed, but then suddenly your next door neighbor has the property surveyed and tells you to move your back fence, you can take them to court and potentially claim that extra 5 feet as your own. But you can't just scoot your back fence over a couple inches every year and then eventually lay claim to your neighbor's backyard because they didn't notice it was shrinking, nor can you "find" "abandoned" land, build a house on it, and then claim it as your own. I believe there are a few jurisdictions where this actually is the case, but it's fewer than many people believe. And then of course you have the reality of squatters invading people's homes while they are on vacation for a week and the police being completely unwilling to get involved, which I understand was a big problem in France for a while.

IANAL


You're getting bogged down in details and ignoring my main point.


Why would you need the ownership of that?

All I care is the right to create/distribute copies and derived works


Is there a pill or supplement for this? /s


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: