Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | MarionG's commentslogin

> we should not use foreign keys

Not using foreign key constraints is a good idea. Occasionally. Very occasionally.


Life flashes before the eyes upon death. In real time.


All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.


This process is called 'living.' - Sir Terry


I had to read that twice to realize what you were saying. Well played.


I'm a time traveler. I can travel into the future 1 second at a time.


I'm a time traveler. I can travel into the future 4-16 hours at a time. Depends on the amount of ~~alcho~~ time travel fluid intake.


PNG is now actually the most used format on the web: https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/image_format significantly more popular than GIF.

BTW, WebP is used by 0.4% of all websites.


I wonder what their carbon badges add to a site's footprint. Seems a bit counterproductive.


According to W3Techs, 2.4% of the top 10m sites and 7.1% of the top 1k sites support HTTP/3: https://w3techs.com/technologies/breakdown/ce-http3/ranking


Debian still dominates the web server market, but Ubuntu is catching up there too: http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/os-linux/all/all


I highly doubt those stats are accurate.

    > Unix is used by 67.1% of all the websites.
    > Linux is used by 35.9% of all the websites.
This adds up to 103% so I guess Linux is included under Unix? That means 31.2% of servers are running a non Linux Unix? Seems a bit high...


The wording on the site is bad. That is supposed to represent 35.9% of the sites that are hosted are using Linux. Linux is considered a sub-category of Unix on w3techs.

See also: http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/os-unix/all/all


45.2% of UNIX web servers are of an "unknown" variant? How can you detect "UNIX" but not be able to have any idea of what UNIX it is? I'm going to hazard a guess that you'd be able to get numbers of similar accuracy by inspecting /dev/random.

Edit: poking around the site a bit more, I notice that they count Darwin under UNIX but OS X is a separate top-level category alongside Windows and UNIX (albeit one with less than 0.1% share). WTF are they doing? This makes no sense.


Technically you could run a non-OS X Darwin. Maybe that's the explanation?


Could be, but it still doesn't make sense. It's the same underlying stuff, so either they're both UNIX (what I'd vote for) or neither is.


I never said it made sense ;-)


I didn't mean to implicate you in this. I just checked out the site and had to share how ridiculous it is.


We use Ubuntu because our cloud provider supports it and doesn't support Debian (though we could probably hassle them into doing so if we really wanted to push it).


A cloud provider who supports Ubuntu and not Debian almost certainly doesn't know what he's doing; I'd consider it a warning sign, although not an outright disqualifier.


Your cloudiness may vary. This was the place we used to have a lot of hosted boxes with, they treat VMs much like they used to treat the hosted boxes.

We are in fact leaving them by the end of 2014, er the end of 2015, er some time in 2016. (It turns out disentangling years of encrusted dependencies is complicated.)

But in practice, Ubuntu is a perfectly good version of Debian for our purposes, so we'll probably stick with it. The devs also like it on their desktops so feel happier targeting the same thing on the server.


Could you explain why you think so?


If you support Ubuntu, it's trivial to extend that to Debian. Ubuntu is still very tightly pinned to Debian.


That's not true for the kernel, which is probably one of the most important parts for a virtual server provider, if they want the instances to run as efficiently as possible.


That may be cheap, but once you see a little traffic spike coming from Hacker News, all you get is an "Error establishing a database connection."


And that is why to this day I always carry a stick of butter in my purse. Also, that is why I always enable WP SuperCache and nginx proxy_cache when running a WordPress site. Or just use a static site generator.


And that is why to this day I always carry a stick of butter in my purse

That sounds a like a reference, but I don't know it. Could you explain?


Sorry, probably a bit of stupid humor on my part. American Dad! season 6 episode 10. Francine and Stan have been married for a really long time and Francine always tell Stan the same story: she got her head stuck in the staircase banister and her mother got her out using a stick of butter, so now she also always carries a stick of butter in her purse in case of emergencies.

This is mildly like the situation where you should always slashdot-proof your web servers if it's easy to do, just in case some piece of content you have on there gets slashdotted. I feel like I say this so much that it's become my "stick of butter" story.


Yahoo uses the YUI library


YUI stands for Yahoo User Interface. They wrote it and open-sourced it, like Google with the Closure Library. I wouldn't count it as a third-party library.


Right, it's not 3rd party, but it is included in the statistics that show 90% jQuery market share, and the argument was that the biggest websites are not represented there.


I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but I don't see anybody making that argument in this thread.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: