Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | froggychairs's commentslogin

I’m not a C++ guy, but this topic fascinates me. Might poke around and try to have an LLM transpile the code from C++ to Rust. I expect it won’t work but worth giving it a shot :)


C++ of 1996 predates the first ISO standard (1998) and the Boost library (1999). Back then, c++ code was still relatively readable...


Actually even now it can be. Look up the serenity os project. Andreas keeps things nice and tidy.


its just c with classes, you will be ok


I’d love something similar for indoor gardening. I have an apartment with great sun exposure but no yard to take advantage of it….


OpenAI models are exclusively Azure only. Llama2 should have an AWS option I believe?


I believe it’s implying the free ChatGPT collects data and this one doesn’t.


Why would aliens have to destroy?

When I go out for a hike in the woods or a hike in a new state/country that isn’t my home. I don’t go out destroying the land around me. I observe and enjoy my time

Maybe these aliens are scientists. Documenting biological life across the galaxy. Maybe they’re VanCampers. Just bouncing from planet to planet for fun

If a civilization has presumably reached FTL travel. I imagine many of their needs have been met and conquest/destruction isn’t required to maintain their supremacy. Lots of empty planets with plenty of resources out there!

Not saying aliens/UFOs are real, but I think it’s very easy to imagine them existing and not being destructive. Or maybe they’re just scouting before the invasion :)


Seriously. There's nothing here that they can't find out in space in greater quantities and easier access. Except our animal and plant life. And no worries about harvesting us like in movies, it's way easier to grow meat or whatever than travel across the universe for it. We're most likely a curiosity.


> Maybe these aliens are scientists.

Their opsec's way too good for scientists. If they're anything like our scientists, we'd have recovered one of the flying saucers when they tried to go through Arby's drive-through but didn't have enough clearance.

Maybe they're just fictional, and this guy has a Fox Mulder larping fetish.

> If a civilization has presumably reached FTL travel. I imagine many of their needs have been met and conquest/destruction isn’t required to maintain their supremacy.

If we ever achieve FTL travel, do you imagine that it will be available to frat bros doing road trips to Beta Reticuli VI, or will it be this horrendously expensive, economy-wrecking thing that we get to do once or twice and then have to stop because it is almost impossible to do?

We achieved a moon landing for fuck's sake, and the frat bro still hasn't duplicated that one yet (though I will concede he's not doing too shabby).


> Their opsec's way too good for scientists.

I think it’s a mistake to imagine how an alien species would behave based on our own tendencies.

A civilization that has achieved what their (supposed) presence here implies has clearly managed to move far beyond human capability, and our understanding of opsec seems irrelevant.

It could be that with sufficiently advanced technology, “opsec” is mostly irrelevant relative to a species like ours with the capabilities we have.


they said "detection" not "destruction"


And that's fine and all, but it's been nearly a hundred years and they're still doing the same shit? Are we supposed to believe we are the equivalent of a tourist attraction? One where you seem to have a high likelihood of dying?


Not saying I believe this, but for sake of argument…

If these are scientific/observation missions, humanity is going through its most transformative stages of advancement, and the last 100 years have been quite interesting.

If we could go and observe a developing civilization secretly and over a long period of time, I suspect we would.


Rare, but sometimes people die going out on safari in sub-Saharan Africa reserves / game parks. no cite, just google away on this one.


To me the most interesting aspect is that all of the alien discussions and reports spiked after we invented nuclear weapons.

At the same time that’s also when we got mass media, developed our own funky airplanes and got portable cameras etc.


One of the best pitches I’ve ever read for an IPCC report. They are good reads too! Maybe not very joyful.


We are not doomed. The climate is changing but we can still adapt. We can still lower emissions. We can still remove GHG from the atmosphere

Doomerism is an awful mindset to have. It’s difficult to feel this way but there’s still a lot of hope and a lot of amazing people working on this.

There is certainly lots of pain ahead. My home nation will be underwater by 2100s, lots of animal species will go extinct, but we are not doomed.


> We can still lower emissions.

If the world were to decrease to net 0 today and until 2050, we'd still expect average and mean temperatures to continue to increase through 2050.

> We can still remove GHG from the atmosphere

These are mostly prototypes and we do not have the capacity to get to 0 with these technologies yet.


ah I think even that is a bit pessimistic. I'm optimistic that we can figure out carbon sequestration and transition to renewables in the next few decades and prevent any catastrophic sea level rise. I fully admit that the global North will not give a shit if some peripheral nations are destroyed by climate change, but I think this summer is starting to show people living in Vegas and Phoenix that their days there are numbered if we don't do something. Maybe I'm being optimistic though.


The recent news that Greenland was ice-free at +1.5C has increased my pessimism again.


yeah I think it's becoming clear that stopping emissions isn't enough and we will have to do carbon capture but Iceland has a functional carbon removal plant up and running and Exxon apparently sees it as part of their economic future. Lots of bad news out there and we need to accelerate the pace but optimism gives us energy for pushing the political front.

https://www.semafor.com/article/07/21/2023/exxon-carbon-denb...


The Iceland plant will pull 4000 metric tons of CO2 / year, so my toilet-paper math says we're going to need at least 9 million more of these plants to achieve net zero.


That's actually a bit less bleak than I would have expected.


/sarcasm . dark humour

Sorry for the misplaced optimism , if it makes you feel more bleak, building all those DAC facilities, transporting them and running them will require millions more of DAC facilities.


I just mean that it seems like actually a somewhat possible number for humans to build, though obviously it's more like infeasible than impossible. I pretty well realized how fucked humanity is around a decade ago, so it has been interesting to watch the realization spreading.


oh ya I'm saying we need to achieve net zero plus have carbon removal. We need to be net negative, we are already in catastrophe territory as far as much carbon is in the atmosphere (I am not a scientist to be clear).


To be clear, Net Zero requires massive direct-air carbon removal, i.e. the only way to achieve it 'net zero' is the permanent removal of billions and billions tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere and storing it somewhere.

36-37 Billion tonnes of CO2/yr, ..


We aren't doomed as a species, but billions of people will die.


Im sure this is useful but these languages (proof langs, constraints, etc) are always so difficult to parse or read

Adoption for these systems might be higher if they had a more readable syntax (and bonus if they could transpile down to source code you can tweak)

Also maybe I missed it on mobile, but I would love examples of the syntax and examples of application usage on the first page. Maybe this is useful to me! Who knows? That information should be easy to find


I’ve played with minizinc in the past though we use scipopt now instead.

The minizinc code looks pretty reasonable to me though. Specify your variables as ranges. Specify your constraints as math equations. Tell it what you’re looking to maximise / minimise.

https://www.minizinc.org/doc-2.7.6/en/modelling.html#ex-cake...


Judging from this particular example, it doesn't look a lot different than more established optimization software like CVXPY, no?

https://www.cvxpy.org/examples/basic/linear_program.html


Yes exactly, we need typescript style solution to get best 80% of ocaml/haskell available to joes kind of thing.


Do you not find this idea somewhat embarrassing?

Why does everything need to look like JavaScript in order for Average Joe programmer to be able to read it?


It absolutely doesn’t.

But I can’t use OCaml or Coq at work.

I can use typescript. I can use algebraic data types, well typed functional combinators, exhaustive switch statements (through linter) and other functional design patterns.

I’d like to be able to use formal proofs. If it means dumbed down version that average joe can work with that can gain wider adoption - that’s much better situation to be in than not having anything at all.

There must be more developers in similar situation.


This is really impressive from the outset. You might get some interest in ClimateTech spaces. Groups like Work on Climate might be a good way to find co-founders. Best of luck!


Thank you! I will look them up


API looks very clean :) I’ve also been avoiding LangChain since it just seems too big for my tastes. Will give this a shot


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: