Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jabbywocker's commentslogin

>Where do I add the JavaScript for that? Is it raw, inline, or are we back to packages and bundling and a build step?

That’s really your call to make. I’ve never went the full build step with it, but I’ve only built some internal dashboards and crud apps with it.


As the CEO of HTMX I can assure you that you’ve only scratched the surface of the HATEOAS doctrines


Don’t follow him much but do you got any links discussing Blow being sexist, racist, homophobic, and transphobic?


This provides a good summary of the drama that he cultivates: https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/s/aB0aOJ5cas


Clicking on a random link:

> It doesn't help that all males currently under the age of 40 were raised to be supercucks

https://x.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/1854708962462982465

Dear lord, yeah, this is why I completely tuned him out years ago. Somewhat ironically it's the Blow fans in this thread that are cherry picking his comments. He's way too online so says things like this all the time, and it's the fans that are in here demanding a smoking gun comment that somehow proves he's awful rather than telling him "sometimes it's ok to stfu" to comments like this that enable and echo chamber him.

And I say this as a fan of Braid and The Witness (at least of the first couple of layers of puzzles...as you go deeper, just like with Braid, you find more and more self-indulgent windbaggery that should have been on the cutting room floor).


Game Helpin' Squad totally takes the piss out of Braid's self-indulgent windbaggery in this review of "Time Travel Understander":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fABGyVzVwI


This comment is pretty much the entire discussion whittled down to its essence.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/1jh275b/ove...


Wow, what a nauseating subreddit. They are notorious for poisoning the well, bad faith cherrypicking to misrepresent positions, and blowing their positions completely out of proportion, all for the sole effort of smearing whoever or whatever they make a topic about.

And everything in that post are bad faith links to secondary reactionary sources.

I don't really know much about Jonathan Blow or Jai or really follow it but it's astonishing to me that anyone could possibly take anything from that toxic subreddit with any sort of seriousness.


The second paragraph of the linked article?


The Reddit link didn’t load for some reason and the other day be didn’t include anything racist, homophobic or transphobic. What it did cover is definitely a simplistic view ignoring the cultural nuances that might lower women’s participation in stem, but I’m not sure I’d classify it as sexist.


He suggests women are biologically less capable than men in STEM. But I note you didn't include misogyny as a problematic belief.


Maybe I read it wrong but I took it as him saying women are “naturally” less interested in STEM not that they are less capable in the area.

And I’d say that misogyny falls under “sexist” in the list of problematic stuff


I wonder what his take on the differences of IQ among races are. Bet it's also as "enlightening"


[flagged]


> a basic biological fact

> looks inside

> opinion

He literally tells you that it's his bellyfeel: "I believe it is likely that (...)". Come on...


[flagged]


>the same opinion being an uncontroversial fact in biology,

I'm confused is it opinion or fact? Can't be both, can it?


> one that every practicing biologist would agree with

Where are you getting this from? As far as I'm aware biologists, practicing or not, are not particularly concerned with the study of human behavior.


It's a "biological fact" that women are less interested in technology?


You aren’t refuting a negative because the statement isn’t “they are unrelated” the statement is “(with current information) there is nothing suggesting they are related”

If you’re close to the situation, and have a substantiated reason to believe the claim that there’s no current information suggesting they’re related is inaccurate, you should be able to back that up. Except we both know you can’t, because you’re attempting to refute something that wasn’t actually said.


Maybe you’re ignoring the context that he’s replying to the author and saying “only” because he’s comparing his 53 with the author’s 150+


I read the article, and I saw Simon's note about the 150+ HTML apps, I just don't get it.


There’s nothing to really get. There’s no deep meaning to the numbers or the comparison


I’m expecting Apple to release a new Mac Pro in the next couple years who’s main marketing angle is exactly this


Seems like it could be a thing.

Also, I’m curious and in case anyone that knows reads this comment:

Apple say they can’t get the performance they want out of discreet GPUs.

Fair enough. But yet nVidia becomes the most valuable company in the world selling GPUs.

So…

Now I get that Apples use case is essentially sealed consumer devices built with power consumption and performance tradeoffs in mind.

But could Apple use its Apple Silicon tech to build a Mac Pro with its own expandable GPU options?

Or even other brand GPUs knowing they would be used for AI research etc…. If Apple ever make friends with nVidia again of course :-/

What we know of Tim Cooks Apple is that it doesn’t like to leave money on the table, and clearly they are right now!


There’s been rumors of Apple working on M-chips that have the GPU and CPU as discrete chiplets. The original rumor said this would happen with the M5 Pro, so it’s potentially on the roadmap.

Theoretically they could farm out the GPU to another company but it seems like they’re set on owning all of the hardware designs.


Apple always strives for complete vertical integration.

SJ loved to quote Alan Kay:

"People who are really serious about software should make their own hardware."

Qualcomm are the latest on the chopping block, history repeating itself.

If I were a betting man I'd say Apple's never going back.


Yeah outside of TSMC, I don’t see them ever going back to having a hardware partner.


TSMC has a new tech that allows seamless integration of mini chiplets, i.e. you can add as many CPU/GPU cores in mini chiplets as you wish and glue them seamlessly together, at least in theory. The rumor is that TSMC had some issues with it which is why M5P and M5M are delayed.


It’s really the only common reason to buy a machine that big these days. I could see a Mac Pro with a huge GPU and up to a terabyte of RAM.

I guess there are other kinds of scientific simulation, very large dev work, and etc., but those things are quite a bit more niche.


> I’m expecting Apple to release a new Mac Pro in the next couple years

I think Apple is done with expansion slots, etc.

You'll likely see M5 Mac Studios fairly soon.


I’m not saying a Mac Pro with expansion slots, I’m saying a Mac Pro whose marketing angle is locally running AI models. A hungry market that would accept moderate performance and is already used to bloated price tags has to have them salivating.

I think the hold up here is whether TSMC can actually deliver the M5 Pro/Ultra and whether the MLX team can give them a usable platform.


I fear they no longer care about the workstation market, even the folks at ATP Podcast are at the verge of accepting it.


You’re 100% correct companies can’t survive by being a niche market choice. The options are complete global market saturation or failure.

/unjerk out of all the potential mindsets to inherit from the US, the “corporate maximalist” frame of reference is one of the dumbest we have to offer


His pedantic point is that due to the way the original question was written, the answer is “yes” regardless if you object or not.

The question was “isn’t that the state with license plates that say ‘live free or die’?” And even if you get a license plate that doesn’t say it, NH is still the state with those plates


It kind of does, no one repeating it ever thinks they’re the weak men creating hard times


Then she ends up taking the blame for causing lots of headaches from people that can’t parse context


It's sometimes Kate, Jason, or Yamal.

But it's always Dennis.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: