Last top was 2022

Seems like it’s not how many people are that matter, but more how people died to get that number. More people isn’t an inherent good.

If it is good for Jim to be alive, given his level of utility, then why isn't it also good for Jane and George to be alive at the same level of utility?

If that’s the case then you’re competing with other parties for those 50 so you’re back to it being hard

Very high flake rate like 2/3

sounds like partly they didn't have access to great pigments back then

Well, they didn't have pigments that would maintain their color and adhere to a surface for 2000 years.

Do we?

Grammarly bought Superhuman and it’s already a public company

Not a public company.

Ah my mistake

I discovered this independently myself a decade ago since it’s true

Which fell apart in shambles under Gödel

Incredible, you managed to mention Gödel's incompleteness theorem on HN without wildly mis-stating what it's about ;)

A real scientist wouldn’t use an imprecise term like “brain-like”

You can, of course, use the almost equivalent scientific-sounding Latin-derived term ("neuromorphic"), buy popcorn, and come back with it for a discussion about memristors.

Yes but “brain-like” is clickbait in the headline

Missed it - seems HN moderation (or OP?) changed the headline to the paper title.

The guy’s name is Wade and he’s studying the ancient Song of Wade closely

Nominative determinism at work