Looks like basic thirst trap content , probably not included to maximize their rage baiting. I don't understand why these puritans don't just move to the middle east. They instead ruin the internet for the rest of us.
They already censored the not-porn (but still NSFW) photos. I don't think it would've made as much of a difference censoring the porn photos as well, especially when trying to convince people that they're not just creating click-bait.
A lot of folks use TikTok on a regular basis. This article is the one making the claim that's far and away different from what most folks experience on the platform.
Since I'm not about to go on there, pretend to be a 13-year old boy, and start seeking out the porn myself, I really need to see some evidence that this is a thing that is actually possible before I start picking out a pitchfork.
I guess I'll just trust them bro ? Have you tried finding them on tiktok? Because even when I deliberately tried I couldn't find any. They claim that children accidentally stumble into these videos.
I just created an account, and the subscription page in the app shows a $50 charge, while the public pricing page shows $10 with 'Minimum 5 seats' in small letters.
Your post says about $10 charge, I am not sure how it happened with current flow.
Be very direct about the pricing, and please use your own product so customers are not confused.
In the post I mentioned that we build several products. I didn’t want to list them all, because I always feel a bit awkward about self-promotion. My goal with the post was to spark a dialogue, not to advertise.
RE pricing page: yes, we do state that there’s a minimum of 5 seats. But there are no chargebacks here, since we don’t take a card upfront and we don’t bill in a hidden way. In the worst case, if you missed or didn’t read that detail, you can simply decline and not subscribe after the trial. You’ll see the price in Stripe before giving us your card. And if you prefer, you can stay on the free plan for up to 5 ppl.
> But there are no chargebacks here, since we don’t take a card upfront and we don’t bill in a hidden way. In the worst case, if you missed or didn’t read that detail, you can simply decline and not subscribe after the trial.
This is a dark pattern. You should display the actual minimum monthly charge in text that is at least as large as the price per user.
No, the worst case is the customer gets the $10 price into their head and then doesn't see the actual monthly charge amount when they subscribe. You are now charging the customer 5x what they expected to pay.
No ones reads anymore, even the article ends with,
"In a statement, a police spokesperson in Schwabach, Bavaria, said the animal had “been brought down to size, taught about its territory boundaries and placed on a nearby stretch of grass”."
> Personally I don't understand why anyone would have opted to use the Bitnami images for most things.
At my previous company, we used it because of the low CVE counts. We needed to report the CVE count for every Docker image we used every month, so most of the images were from Bitnami.
There are many enterprise companies freeloading on Bitnami images, and I’m surprised it took Broadcom this long to make this change.
https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/digital-threats/tikto...
I don't know why news sites don't link to the source, but that's another discussion.