Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more pdntspa's commentslogin

Just yesterday I saw a Sora-generated video that purported to be someone filming a failed HIMARS missile failing and falling on stopped traffic and exploding on the 5 in Camp Pendleton on Saturday. (IRL they were doing some kind of live-fire drill and it did actually involve projectiles flying over the freeway.)

While there were some debris instances IRL the freeway was completely shut down per the governors orders and nobody was harmed. (Had he not done this, that same debris may have hit motorists, so this was a good call on his part)

You could see the "Sora" watermark in the video, but it was still popular enough to make it in my reels feed that is normally always a different kind of content.

In this case whoever made that was sloppy enough to use a turnkey service like Sora. I can easily generate videos suitable for reels using my GPU and those programs don't (visibly) watermark.

We are in for dark times. Who knows how many AI-generated propaganda videos are slipping under the radar because the operator is actually half-skilled.


> I can easily generate videos suitable for reels using my GPU and those programs don't (visibly) watermark.

Curious what you used. I have an RTX 5090 and I've tried using some local video generators and the results are absolute garbage unless I'm asking for something extremely simple and uncreative like "woman dancing in a field".


A quick search found this example 18 second video generated on 3090: https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1kp5jb8/da...

I am pretty sure what you want is doable on a 5090 with some effort but it will not be just a text prompt to video. More like input key frames as images and interpolate video between them.


This needs to be boosted more to this community; WE are creating the tools of our own oppression.

The folks at the top know how susceptible we are to being nerd-sniped and how readily we will build these things for them.


I want to create automation and greater efficiencies because I believe it is good for the world to have better goods and services, cheaper.

The bigger problem I see is not automation, it is the exploitation of addictive behaviours to “capture attention”.


I don’t give a fuck how cheap you make bread and circuses. The only goods and services I give a fuck about anymore are the ones that won’t be made cheaper with automation.


Speak for yourself. I want cheaper building costs so we can build more housing, cheaper and safer vehicles, higher quality food so we can all be healthier, better medical technology and medicines so we can solve more diseases, and new washing-machine-like technologies so I can spend more time with friends/family. That’s not to mention that greater leverage on my labour would give me even more flexibility to choose the work I want to do, and how much I want to work.

Bread is already so cheap as to not notice the price most of the time. But other goods and services are absolutely not that cheap. And there’s certainly higher quality that could be achieved, especially in areas like medicine. It is a lack of imagination to not see all the ways in which cheaper goods and services could improve our lives.


Making all of those things cheaper is great, as long the automation isn't also making everyone poorer at an equal or faster rate. It doesn't really help if house prices and food prices are cut in half if most people lose their employment because of automation.

I think the concern is that true human+ AGI and advanced robotics would obsolete so many roles that it doesn't matter if things can be made more efficiently, because nobody will have any money at all. If/when AI can do my job better than me, it isn't giving me leverage, it is removing all leverage I have as someone who puts food on the table through labor.

In the interim period before that happens then sure, the automation is great for some people who can best leverage it.


On the path to “AGI” I would expect a lot of short-term pain as people lose their jobs while unemployment is still around normal levels. But if unemployment rises too much, we would pass laws to protect people, like greater corporate taxes to fund things like UBI.

But honestly, if we have this level of automation it feels like it would be very hard to predict how society will evolve. I would expect our current model of work-to-live to become untenable, and we’d move to something else. I doubt that transition will be easy.


It's never going to go down like that as long as companies are required to serve shareholder interests above customers' or employees'.

Instead all these automation tools are and will be used to cut corners and optimize on cost. Quality, peace-of-mind, and increased free time will be the sales pitch used to placate us plebes. But we all know what the executive dipshits will really care about.


Most people here could choose to work less than full-time hours if they wanted to. I already do (although I do it so I can work more on my own projects, to be fair).

Although, maybe going against the hedonic treadmill is against our nature. There’s always a nicer house in a better neighbourhood to work for. But I at least want more people to have the choice to work fewer hours through higher wages. That might not come for free with economic growth, but it certainly won’t come without it.


Yes but pointy-haired bosses are much more amenable to the sales pitch of, "insert story, receive PR"


I've found it to be excellent but 2.5 seems to experience context collapse around 50k tokens or so. At least that is my findings when using it heavily with Roo Code

I've since switched to Claude Code and I no longer have to spend nearly as much time managing context and scope.


Free unlimited global text messaging in a time when people with very low incomes dealt with very low limits or per-message fees.

Much of the love was built before Facebook took it over.


It's hilarious just how much of a witchhunt on AI is kicked off from a bunch of vague heuristics.

Writing this as someone who likes using em dash and now I have to watch that habit because everyone is obsessed with sniffing out AI.

Cliched writing is definitely bad. I guess I should be happy that we are smashing them one way or another.


I don't want to take the time writing up a cogent response to an article someone didn't bother taking the time to write. With this particular article, there were a couple of points I wanted to respond to, before I realized there was no human mind behind them.

I've always liked the HN community because it facilitates an intelligent exchange of ideas. I've learned a lot trawling the comments on this site. I don't want to see the energy of human discourse being sucked up and wasted on the output of ChatGPT. Aggressively flagging this stuff is a sort of immune response for the community.


I wonder how it's different from when a collegue sends you an llm PR.


You get paid

And it's the employers problem, if you don't react too much emotionally


I have thought like this since the slop wave hit, but hadn't yet put it into words. Gratified to see someone else do it


It's not a witchhunt for AI. It's a witchhunt for bad writing.


I find gemini 2.5 pro starts losing its shit around 50K tokens, using Roo Code. Between Roo's system prompt and my AGENTS.md there's probably about 10k used off the bat. So I have about 30-40k tokens to complete whatever task I assign it.

It's a workable limit but I really wish I could get more out of a single thread before it goes crazy. Does this match others' experience?


Time to hug my Windows 11 24H2 ISO I guess?


I really hate that it was brought up as a bullet point at all. Like who fucking cares, why is this guy bringing up that boogieman.


Is this not an overreaction to the rubygems rubycentral fiasco?


No.

Imagine if someone came into your house and changed all of the locks on you/your family, because "security". You had built that house from your original designs but the other party claims they own it now because they happen to manage a series of rental listings for houses built to your design. You had even made it so the plans could be copied and modified in private; if "security" were a real concern with about 10 minutes effort to do so.

Would you agree that it is right, do nothing? Or would you rebuild something new, given how little time it takes to copy the plans.

Swap "house design" for "software project" and "rental listings" for "running an instance of your software project" and you have the current situation.

Developers are free to choose the party they trust more.


Yeah and now we have a fragmented ecosystem. If the projects were placed under RubyCentral's management and active contributors' access is restored I don't see a big deal.

Yes the manner in which it was handled was really bad but given the supply-chain attacks we're seeing against the Python and JS worlds, I think auditing contributor access and consolidating certain privileges is prudent.

Again, handled poorly. But a lot of money rides on stuff like Bundler. We need a strict security posture.

edit- I am an artist; I get the concern and distaste. But at a certain point your art grows bigger than you. If you as a private individual build a bridge used from a public roadway and you don't do the necessary maintenance or management your shit gets shut down. Not sure how this is much different.


...so your argument is.... stay with the abusers?


I'm questioning this abuse of the term "abusers". It frames the arguments about this situation in bad faith.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: