Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | poisonborz's commentslogin

Congrats to creating something you think is valuable. Do you see a risk that your business model is taking away income from an API provider that you 100% depend on - meaning the plug could be pulled at any minute while you have paying customers?

The answer is almost always either "sales trick" or "slave labor".

That doesn't explain a lot, why were those things not used in 2000?

I see these posts left and right but no one mentions the _actual_ thing developers are hired for, responsibility. You could use whatever tools to aid coding already, even copy paste from StackOverflow or take whole boilerplate projects from Github already. No AI will take responsibility for code or fix a burning issue that arises because of it. The amount of "responsibility takers" also increases linearly with the size of the codebase / amount of projects.

That's quickly becoming the most important part of our jobs - we're the ones with agency and the ability to take responsibility for the work we are producing.

I'm fine with contributed AI-generated code if someone who's skills I respect is willing to stake their reputation on that code being good.


We still do that, it's just that realtime code review basically becomes the default mode. That's not to say it's not obvious there will not be a lot less of us in future. I vibed about 80% of a SaaS at the weekend with a very novel piece of hand-written code at the centre of it, just didn't want to bother with the rest. I think that ratio is about on target for now. If the models continue to improve (although that seems relatively unlikely with current architectures and input data sets), I expect that could easily keep climbing.

I just cutpasted a technical spec I wrote 22 years ago I spent months on for a language I never got around to building out, Opus zero-shotted a parser, complete with tests and examples in 3 minutes. I cutpasted the parser into a new session and asked it to write concept documentation and a language reference, and it did. The best part is after asking it to produce uses of the language, it's clear the aesthetics are total garbage in practice.

Told friends for years long in advance that we were coal miners, and I'll tell you the same thing. Embrace it and adapt


>the _actual_ thing developers are hired for, responsibility.

It is a well known fact that people advance their tech careers by building something new and leaving maintenance to others. Google is usually mentioned.

By which I mean, our industry does a piss poor job of rewarding responsibility and care.


Which is why I'm more comfortable using AI as an editor/reviewer than as a writer.

I'll write the code, it can help me explore options, find potential problems and suggest tests, but I'll write the code.


CEOs mostly just set direction, the workforce remains the same (sans mass-layoffs).

I’d wager that mass layoffs only crystallize the essence of a company, removing everyone who isn’t willing to conform 100%, for better or worse.

A giant machine sheds all that slows down its drive (to somewhere), even by thinking too much, and, at a certain size, it may actually be an advantage


You know how forums turned bad because people with good manners/communication skills can just go to a different discussion place so over time you consolidate with a toxic base of people with nowhere else to go?

Even if a company tries to get rid of the bad people, once you start doing random, the line must go up layoffs, the best people leave and then use their network within the company to poach the next down layers of good people. Current American 'layoff while spending the money on stock buybacks' is corporate suicide.


Yes, and it's clear that the direction is "shove ai everywhere".

Yeah the direction is down the shitter, and you can blame the CEO Satya Nadella for that.

No, they also approve major decisions that affect that directional change.

This was approved by the CEO, without doubt.


I wish there were some self-hosted setup that would replicate this based on either tags, bpm matching, or other similarity indicators snooped from online sites like lastfm.

I've been using https://www.beatunes.com/en/beatunes-matchlist.html (35€ for Mac or Windows) to create static playlists like this for years from my library of ~13K songs. I've created a few dozen such playlists with light curation (just kicking a song out here and there). I find myself listening to these playlists far more than the ones I created completely by hand.

I suppose you could do it often, or maybe even script it (e.g., with Keyboard Maestro on Mac) to get something a little more dynamic. But it's not something that just matches songs on the fly server side.


Comments like this are not much worth without context. Each model has wildly different perf per each language and framework, project architecture (if it can be followed up successfully). No two devs on different projects have the same experience. Even insights like "Anthropic has a lead" is a broad generalization.

Can’t give an extensive reply as I’m on mobile, but FWIW I’ve tried Claude and Codex and Copilot. We use Python and standard microservice architecture, nothing special at all.

I’ve had the most success with using one agent to write a plan document and another to follow that plan doc.


Cars require the least amount of public infra and can be run relatively cheaply, allow for free movement.

Contrast this with literally every other type of western public transport project going several times over budget, expensive to use and maintain and breaks down after a decade. I'm all for the idea, but that's the reality.


> Cars require the least amount of public infra and can be run relatively cheaply, allow for free movement.

Source?

> Contrast this with literally every other type of western public transport project going several times over budget, expensive to use and maintain and breaks down after a decade.

Source?


Despite this, cars will be the best - cheapest, fastest - means of transportation to most of the society until we have transparent crruptionless (AI?) governments. Apart a few cases - extreme distances (air), multimillion metro areas, handful of asian coutries due to culture - public transport is a mostly failed idea.

> public transport is a mostly failed idea.

Citation needed. I have been to many cities where I would never drive a car, but public transport is fine.


It is in the distant future still (if we ever get there without apocalypse first) but I think the goal was set out to be, from the very first bits of digital data, is to completely transition ourselves to a digital world. Living it in parallel will make less sense if Earth conditions get worse, and even less in space or on a hostile planet. In a digital world possibilities become limitless, disabilities, distances, shortcomings of the mind eliminated. Once you can't see a difference, will it matter if something is "real"? Sure, it can also become a hell and inhumane much easier, but this doesn't make it a less compelling dimension.

Looking through this lens, fighting, limiting internet usage is akin to moving to the rainforest to avoid capitalism - lone rebelling acts in the wrong direction of history, a temporary, partial victory for the few who dare this hassle.

Time is better spent to make this emerging space better, for everyone.


Given to the direction we're going, I don't believe this digital world will be one in which we're free either.

Rather than good I would say "same". Excellent text editor, very barebones for actual development work.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: