Badger looks promising, though I'm not database-expert enough to know when to choose LSM tree database. (BoltDB is B tree, and Badger is LSM tree with value log.)
I use Evernote rather than bookmark, which you get organized with nothing but folder structuring. It's totally hard to manage, validate, and find when you want to.
Evernote, on the other hand, provides a creative means: taking a note on your own way. By creating a Notebook and a Note, you can give a brief statement of the linked articles, which could come in useful for later full-text search.
Longform Podcast entertains me with a variety of guests, who is typically a writer, a editor, or a journalist, invited for each episodes. With dialogues about their work and career, it gives a glimpse of a life of those who work in the media industry. The podcast is a oral history of media workers, and it often gives valuable insights to just listen to interviews and see interviewees as they are.
Facing challenges like fake news, Google AMP, FaceBook InstantArticle, and the like, some of you may be interested.
I guess that the main benefit of GitHub Marketplace would be the full-scale integration with GitHub Issue and Project board, launched last year. Consider a common situation: when CI fails, people need to reopen an issue manually, getting an error report via email. People who are in charge of project management may be seeking a better way to streamline the manual task, which probably increased since the introduction of Project board.
To be clear, I’ve been away from software development over the years, so I’m curious about the impact of Project board. Does it useful in the first place? Did it require manual tasks between other services such as CI? Do you, who is in charge of issue or board assignment, feel frustration using it?
I want Apple News and Instant Article to join in AMP so that media developers could reduce the cost of news distribution following the single standard. I even want crawling services, Feedly or Pocket, to serve AMP with advertisements so that I could support writers, journalists and media companies; besides, I have no idea if web feed, RSS or Atom, could consume AMP.
Google, which would gain the most benefit from AMP, deserves criticism for potential abuse of their power. Online media, which serve pages with poor performance, deserve criticism for its reluctance to improve their poor UX. AMP, however, hardly deserves criticism, through a perspective of user experience and news distribution.
AMP may look intimidating to the open web philosophy, be tepid approach from a technological point of view. But we need more experiment as it stands: everyone can become a media with the Web, old media is still playing a valuable role in society, online media lack prospects for the future to be profitable enough to invest in journalism. Fighting for the open web is good, but fighting for it without caring about anyone but technological principle is no good.
SF projects should be about promoting openness though, so if "ease of governments" also means "making the government more transparent", that might be an option.
Badger looks promising, though I'm not database-expert enough to know when to choose LSM tree database. (BoltDB is B tree, and Badger is LSM tree with value log.)