Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Personally, I think if you’ve reached a point where consensus hasn’t formed naturally in some other venue then it is kind of a failure.

Trying to hash thing out in a meeting is ok as a last resort, but it seems less than ideal. Particularly when people often need time to form coherent ideas.

Group meeting with lots of presentations? Just sounds like my idea of hell really. I’d much prefer to read some notes on a subject and then later sit down with someone if I need to go into more detail.



Sometimes it is more inefficient to form consensus outside of a meeting or few I have found, and sometimes can have undesirable side effects such as bad politics arising - I’ve seen this plenty enough.

Hashing things out in a meeting is best after people have let various approaches bake individually - that is not in contradiction to the utility of group meetings.

To be clear, I’m very much against wasting people’s time - getting the right people in a meeting is super important for efficiency on both ends. I’m just highly skeptical that group meetings can be avoided for a lot of efficiency & human reasons.


but what if you don't get time to read the notes and no one is available for a sit down?


Then the info really wasn’t that important to your day to day job, was it?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: