Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Lot's of empty claims.

> some serious shortcoming and a lot more work needs to be put into these serverless platforms

Not actionable at all

> The approach they're taking I don't think will last

No reason given

> It really needs a redesign/restructure

Nothing here too

> And maybe they'll improve it enough by then to make it viable

What makes it (un)viable?



That's fair. I'm the founder of a company building a serverless platform. I didn't want to write specifics because it may reveal details about our approach.


Isn't this a great opportunity to sell us on your solution, or get our feedback? You don't need to reveal details of your approach, but what are the actual problems you see?

As a company that has built our most recent site completely on serverless, we've become familiar with some of the issues. Though I definitely would not consider it a no-go.


That sounds like a very pertinent thing to disclose when offering a critique of a competitor, particularly when you're not able to substantiate (for legitimate reason or otherwise)


Sounds even more fishy


In that case you might wanna take another look at the answers here. Notice how they all use Amazon Lambda?

If you intend to compete with them - you might wanna reconsider.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: