So without digging in to who the client is etc, are you saying that serverless architecture is today, validated enough that the AWS bill can be cut by ... what 25%? more?
That sounds like great savings (plus nice fat contractor bills for rewriting as lambda) - but is it a hit for amazon
(I suspect amazon views it as "kill your own babies" survival but am interested in the margin effect on the data centre business - it's twenty years since i touched a business model of a DC)
PS
I get the prolongment issue - it sounds sensible in the 20 seconds it was covered in the approval meeting, but not when the details are looked at.
This is a new project, not migration of anything existing. "Upsides" was referring to business value of the project itself, not cost savings of migrating to serverless.
So without digging in to who the client is etc, are you saying that serverless architecture is today, validated enough that the AWS bill can be cut by ... what 25%? more?
That sounds like great savings (plus nice fat contractor bills for rewriting as lambda) - but is it a hit for amazon
(I suspect amazon views it as "kill your own babies" survival but am interested in the margin effect on the data centre business - it's twenty years since i touched a business model of a DC)
PS I get the prolongment issue - it sounds sensible in the 20 seconds it was covered in the approval meeting, but not when the details are looked at.