Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have a real problem with people "deciding" who "gets" to have a platform.

I have no problem with individual social media sites setting their own policies as to who they will allow a voice on their site.

I have a big problem when people go further than that, and try to prevent certain people from having any platform anywhere. They'll go after hosting, after advertisers, after anything they can to completely shut a person down.

It is so unbelievably naive to think that those tools of suppression won't be used against everyone at some point in the future. The collective track record of human governments throughout history with regards to human rights has been, and currently is, absolute dogshit.

Whether the true point of "common carrier" should be the internet backbone, I don't know. But there needs to be a point where anyone can run a site to put forth their views, no matter how any individual feels about those views. The problem with restricting speech is that everyone's idea of acceptable free speech infringements is different, and the devil is in the details with something so vitally important.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: