> It's similar to how people say "irregardless", which is clearly an error.
It's an error that's been being made since 1795, though, and people have been understanding it which pretty much qualifies it as being incorporated into the language.
(I should note that I am strongly descriptivist and think that prescriptivists are silly people.)
> using "regardless" is strictly better.
I think "regardless" is better, yes, because it's a lot easier to say but that's just my opinion, not a Gilt Edged Rule Of English.
Yes, that's what language is. Will you be complaining about "apron" as an adaptation to a mistake?
https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/how-a-na...
> It's similar to how people say "irregardless", which is clearly an error.
It's an error that's been being made since 1795, though, and people have been understanding it which pretty much qualifies it as being incorporated into the language.
(I should note that I am strongly descriptivist and think that prescriptivists are silly people.)
> using "regardless" is strictly better.
I think "regardless" is better, yes, because it's a lot easier to say but that's just my opinion, not a Gilt Edged Rule Of English.