The fact that Ukraine has been trying to spread these emails, coincidently around the same time Giuliani happened to be there, which ended up getting the president impeached.
I don't think the GP was speaking of "misinformation" as an alias for "mistruth", I read it as "disinformation", and that is an excellent method where true facts can cover over the larger reality. This is a case in point. Every minute we talk about liberal bias, people stop talking about other things. Arguably, policy on a pandemic that's killed 210,000 people is more important than whether a candidate's son used his last name as cache in a business deal.
> The two people said they could not confirm whether any of the material presented to them was the same as that which has been recently published in the U.S.
Furthermore, they made no effort to determine the authenticity of the documents, so I find it odd that you assume they must be fake:
> The two people who said they were approached with Hunter Biden’s alleged emails last year did not know whether any of them were real
So you used two anonymous sources to support your erroneous conclusion, yet you don't believe all of the sources who have publicly come forward to say the documents are legitimate?
