Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Bittorrent can do random access just fine, especially with v2 which enables content verification in 16KB chunks. Clients tend to be throughput oriented which leads to sub-optimal latency, but that's not a limitation of the protocol.


I guess just fine is a matter of opinion. Connection setup and piece bitmap tracking seems like more overhead than HTTP range requests.


Connection establishment in bittorrent might be marginally higher overhead than HTTP, but not by much and the cost is highly amortized if you're doing many range requests in the same torrent. There is indeed more overhead from HAVE messages and such, but that's just because bittorrent is doing a lot more than HTTP to enable P2P. It's still not that bad as a percentage of the payload traffic.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: