Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> who read 320TB of text

When you said "less data", you did not specify the type of data.

> Could it play chess based on a text description of the game?

We don't know - nobody tried it yet. We tried with 320TB text only.

> If we fed a few years worth of video an audio to a neural network, could it write War and Peace?

As Sonny from "I, robot" said, "can you?"



>you did not specify the type of data.

Obviously, it has to be the same data to make a comparison.

> We don't know - nobody tried it yet.

How would you even train a network unsupervised so that it can play chess from a text description? Nobody knows. That's the point.

>"can you?"

That doesn't matter, Tolstoy could, therefore it's within human capability.


> Obviously, it has to be the same data to make a comparison.

No, it is very much not obvious. There's quite a bit of research showing models, that receive X samples of type A and Y samples on type B might be better in tasks on A, than models that are trained just on X.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: