Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> What would help me is to have the old geezers consider GitHub issues, PRs, and commits as a type of citation

As a geezer myself I am imagining what this type of request would look like in less than 5 years from now.

"What would help me is to have the old geezers consider Tiktok videos and replies as a type of citation"

i.e. if you open this particular can of worms for a very restricted subset of users (not only programmers but specifically programmers who also happen to use github), you have to open it to everyone else. I am sure plenty of Youtube research qualifies as "citation" if you start counting Github commits.



So what?

Papers qua papers aren't the goal. The idea is to advance our collective understanding of a field. Papers are certainly a means to that end, but other things can too, like code, videos, and blogposts, even if they don't fit into the "6000 words and 6 figures" box.

I get that citations and citation metrics feel objective, but they emphatically aren't great measures of research/researcher "quality".


A good youtube video easily can represent more work than a bad (published) paper, so why not.


Tiktok videos are primarily used for entertainment, rather unlike Jupyter notebooks and source code repositories. Surely you have a more serious objection.


You don't read git repos for entertainment?!


For entertainment, I tend to read about things outside my field — things like In the Pipeline where I learn about FOOF and chlorine triflouride and freaky molecules like jawsamycin (insert shark theme here). I also watch Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board videos on YouTube, like that time a refrigerator accident at a poultry plant caused hydraulic shock and released a massive cloud of ammonia, and ~150 contractors hanging out across the river working on Deepwater Horizon cleanup measures got sent to the hospital.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: