As a publishing scientist myself I would have hoped to read more about how I can actually publish Jupyter Notebooks in a way that is recognised academically. That's at least what the title implied for me.
But the article is actually about Mathematica vs. Jupyter notebooks. Still, it's well researched and very interesting.
Nevertheless, the question how to publish better remains open. I for one think that some progress could already be made if ArXiv published html articles by default, rather than those unwieldy PDFs that really only work best when printed on paper.
But the article is actually about Mathematica vs. Jupyter notebooks. Still, it's well researched and very interesting.
Nevertheless, the question how to publish better remains open. I for one think that some progress could already be made if ArXiv published html articles by default, rather than those unwieldy PDFs that really only work best when printed on paper.