> CEPROTECT3 just lumps ISPs into the list even though an address has never sent spam.
But this is by design[0]
> This blacklist has been created for HARDLINERS. It can, and probably will cause collateral damage to innocent users when used to block email.
And it makes for a perfectly usable blocklist. If you use postfix, the postscreen_dnsbl_threshold and postscreen_dnsbl_sites parameters let you create a simple scoring system:
I made up the numbers, because you will need to monitor your system for a while to see if they make sense, but the principle holds. Also make sure that the dnsbl you are using are working for you.
But it isn't really a problem with uceprotect, it's about how DNSBLs are used.
But this is by design[0]
> This blacklist has been created for HARDLINERS. It can, and probably will cause collateral damage to innocent users when used to block email.
And it makes for a perfectly usable blocklist. If you use postfix, the postscreen_dnsbl_threshold and postscreen_dnsbl_sites parameters let you create a simple scoring system:
I made up the numbers, because you will need to monitor your system for a while to see if they make sense, but the principle holds. Also make sure that the dnsbl you are using are working for you.But it isn't really a problem with uceprotect, it's about how DNSBLs are used.
[0] https://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=3&s=5 [1] http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_dnsbl_site...