(Why is it these kinds of discussions get snotty so quickly?)
I don't know how else an end user can express their preference.
IP addresses are PII under the GDPR with enough context - although honestly I don't want to go down that horrible rabbit hole.
But sure, sure, the site operators can do whatever they please. It's just Plausible banging on about being privacy friendly and ethical seems a bit ironic and is frustrating to see.
Plausible is correct in ignoring the DNT flag, as it does not apply to the data they collect. Have you read the DNT policy that the EFF created, which is linked in that issue? It goes further than what the W3C defined, and it still does not apply to the data Plausible collects. In fact, it explicitly allows the collection of more data than Plausible actually collects.
You're really stretching definitions here, and have yet to make an actual argument about how Plausible invades your privacy. I'll just end my involvement in this discussion here, because it's clear to me that it will not be productive.
I don't know how else an end user can express their preference.
IP addresses are PII under the GDPR with enough context - although honestly I don't want to go down that horrible rabbit hole.
But sure, sure, the site operators can do whatever they please. It's just Plausible banging on about being privacy friendly and ethical seems a bit ironic and is frustrating to see.
Edit: The DNT flag is explicitly ignored by Plausible as well: https://github.com/plausible/analytics/discussions/646