Hillary Clinton hadn't received an order from congress to preserve evidence in an ongoing investigation.

Um, using a private server for official correspondences doesn't really require a subpoena to be illegal.

GW had one, and his Admin said he was going to be murdered shortly before his private plane crashed.

Nothing new here. Politics, as usual.

Didn't Trump people use private servers, too? I mean, if we're both sidesing it, let's be consistent.

How is calling out Hillay AND GW "sidesing"?

See how narrow your focus is? It's not your fault, we're all served Kool-Aid every day. YOU may choose to drink it or not.

So we must both sides if Trump is wrong (so as to excuse his behavior) but not both sides to excuse other's behavior? Help me out here, just trying to understand how and when I'm expected to both sides an issue

I feel like this is bait, but I'm taking anyway. Order from Congress, no, you're correct; but ordered by a federal judge: https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?161905

It's not pay walled, per se. PACER is free up to a number of requests. If you don't have an account, make one. If you don't want to put forth that effort, then you are most certainly arguing in partisan and uninformed bad faith. I was going to link a free copy, before I realized the aforementioned bait.

That's just good opsec when you aren't under subpoena.

What, you mean like, wiped it with a cloth? throws head back and cackles