Sure, that's cruel. Unlike Louis XVI, the sheep and cows were not the ones who were accountable for a deeply unfair status quo.
> The real question is, in a modern society, where freedom of speech exists, how disruptive should protests be allowed to be?
Freedom of speech alone does not guarantee fairness.
> I don’t know the answer myself but I think some limits may be required.
What are the guarantees that legislative or executive power over such limits does not get abused for profit or ideology?
Sure, that's cruel. Unlike Louis XVI, the sheep and cows were not the ones who were accountable for a deeply unfair status quo.
> The real question is, in a modern society, where freedom of speech exists, how disruptive should protests be allowed to be?
Freedom of speech alone does not guarantee fairness.
> I don’t know the answer myself but I think some limits may be required.
What are the guarantees that legislative or executive power over such limits does not get abused for profit or ideology?