I think you might be underestimating how different package management is between Debian, Arch, and Fedora. This also ignores the many other differences.
Debian stable will have packages that feel very out of date. Debian unstable (sid) makes no guarantees that an update won't introduce breaking changes.
Fedora Linux has six month major releases, so the packages feel fresher than Debian stable, but are much more stable than Debian unstable. The six month major release vs a rolling release means twice a year you'll have to watch an update carefully.
The barrier of entry for releasing an AUR package is incompatible with my standards of system security, so I refuse to use them. The official repositories feel a little bare in comparison to Fedora and Debian because they have an expectation that AUR will fill in any gaps.
Debian stable will have packages that feel very out of date. Debian unstable (sid) makes no guarantees that an update won't introduce breaking changes.
Fedora Linux has six month major releases, so the packages feel fresher than Debian stable, but are much more stable than Debian unstable. The six month major release vs a rolling release means twice a year you'll have to watch an update carefully.
The barrier of entry for releasing an AUR package is incompatible with my standards of system security, so I refuse to use them. The official repositories feel a little bare in comparison to Fedora and Debian because they have an expectation that AUR will fill in any gaps.