> if you don't have the information that one is far more risky, then you always pick the 95$ option, don't you?
Air travellers by and large choose their travel based on price. If a subset started paying a premium for Airbuses, the market would sort them and remain relatively equally profitable for those flying Boeings.
I decided about 10 years ago I'm willing to pay the premium for economy plus seats (more leg room). I don't fly often enough for the market to notice me, but when I fly I notice that those seats do sell out faster, if nothing else I can still pay extra for those seats. I can also pay extra for first class - however the premium is high enough that I cannot afford it despite wanting to.
Given how quickly Delta's Comfort+ seats sell, I'd be surprised if they don't install more of those. Given their brand, a row or two of Basic Economy (for e.g. college students), a small main, a healthy Comfort+ and a solid front cabin might be the play.
I wonder if they're selling out or being consumed as upgrades? Domestically, I almost always buy an economy ticket on Delta and get upgraded to Comfort+ within 15 minutes of buying the ticket. That means the bus routes (between hubs) probably have a lot of these Skymiles high-tier members taking up the seats without charge.
That data, which I'm sure Delta has and looks at, could strongly influence how many overall rows of seating to remove in order to fit more rows of Comfort+.
Outside of veblen goods, aren't most consumer choices driven by price?
I have never flown top tier air travel, but even the best experience is somewhere on the scale of cattle-car-in-the-sky. It is a necessary evil to get me to somewhere in a way that is faster than driving. Paying a premium has rapidly diminishing returns when you are stuck in a shared space with the public.
Air travellers by and large choose their travel based on price. If a subset started paying a premium for Airbuses, the market would sort them and remain relatively equally profitable for those flying Boeings.