> I swear it's insane that anyone's this obtuse. Read better.
Arrogance and ad homs, as expected. These particular ad homs giving your recent comments are particularly amusing and ironic though.
> I said companies do not have an incentive to respect users' privacy and autonomy.
Your actual claim, the only claim I care about and stepped in to correct you on, is that all cheating can be solved serverside. That's it. I know you like to write essays in place of giving an answer, but that's the only relevant point here.
> You have conflated anticheat with kernel access when the whole argument is about whether it's possible to prevent cheating without it
The entire argument is refuting the nonsense claim that all cheating can be solved serverside. You've yet to provide any proof of that, demonstrate even reasonably grounds to assume that, and dismissed the numerous real world examples and facts that show that case to be unlikely.
> Nearly every post you've made has fundamentally missed the point of the one it's replying to.
If you really believe that, then that's on you for not being clear at all. I've continually backed up my points and addressed yours, all while you constantly disingenuously claim you don't understand my point, lol.
I've outlined what the main point is above. Hopefully you won't still be confused by it.
So please, stop delaying and procrastinating, and just support your fucking claim so we can be done with this, or grow some balls and admit you were wrong, so I can be done with you.
Arrogance and ad homs, as expected. These particular ad homs giving your recent comments are particularly amusing and ironic though.
> I said companies do not have an incentive to respect users' privacy and autonomy.
Your actual claim, the only claim I care about and stepped in to correct you on, is that all cheating can be solved serverside. That's it. I know you like to write essays in place of giving an answer, but that's the only relevant point here.
> You have conflated anticheat with kernel access when the whole argument is about whether it's possible to prevent cheating without it
The entire argument is refuting the nonsense claim that all cheating can be solved serverside. You've yet to provide any proof of that, demonstrate even reasonably grounds to assume that, and dismissed the numerous real world examples and facts that show that case to be unlikely.
> Nearly every post you've made has fundamentally missed the point of the one it's replying to.
If you really believe that, then that's on you for not being clear at all. I've continually backed up my points and addressed yours, all while you constantly disingenuously claim you don't understand my point, lol.
I've outlined what the main point is above. Hopefully you won't still be confused by it.
So please, stop delaying and procrastinating, and just support your fucking claim so we can be done with this, or grow some balls and admit you were wrong, so I can be done with you.