Has it? I don't think many here would agree it is the new norm
> better control over the output
LLMs are notorious for inconsistent output. Deterministic code gen is predictable. The control of a SaaS style low-code project may be limited, some offer to eject the codebase for you. There are numerous open frameworks, like Rails, where you have full control. It's about how you define control. Using a magic box like an LLM to generate code inconsistently comes with a lot of headaches. Why not choose the predictable magic box like Rails?
> Any down voters care to explain why you disagree?
Talking about downvoting typically earns more downvotes because it is against the posting guidelines
Anecdotally, my entire engineering team chooses to use LLM assistance because they feel more productive with it
> Talking about downvoting typically earns more downvotes because it is against the posting guidelines
I’m fine with the down votes. I asked because there were no comments, which makes for a pretty boring discussion. Now there are some comments. Thank you for leaving yours
Has it? I don't think many here would agree it is the new norm
> better control over the output
LLMs are notorious for inconsistent output. Deterministic code gen is predictable. The control of a SaaS style low-code project may be limited, some offer to eject the codebase for you. There are numerous open frameworks, like Rails, where you have full control. It's about how you define control. Using a magic box like an LLM to generate code inconsistently comes with a lot of headaches. Why not choose the predictable magic box like Rails?
> Any down voters care to explain why you disagree?
Talking about downvoting typically earns more downvotes because it is against the posting guidelines