Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think AWS will need to update their documentation to communicate this. Will a snapshot isolation fix introduce a performance regression in latency or throughput? Or, maybe they stand by what they have as being strong enough. Either way, they'll need to say something.


I think the ideal solution from AWS would be fixing the bug and actually providing the guarantees that the docs say that they do.


I agree, but I have a feeling this isn't a small fix. Sounds like someone picked a mechanism that seemed to be equivalent but is not. Swapping that will require a lot of time and testing.


> Swapping that will require a lot of time and testing.

Lucky them, there is an automated suite[1] to verify the correct behavior :-D

1: https://github.com/jepsen-io/rds


there is no trivial fix for this without breaking performance. roughly, there is no free lunch in distributed systems, and AWS made a tradeoff to relax consistency guarantees for that specific setup, and didn't really advertise that


It looks like a bug, but the problem is the documentation does not detail what guarantees are offered in this scenario, but would love if somebody could point me where it does...


Yet bellow your comment is a quote that this is since v13 and above is a comment that there is no mention in the docs.

Using the words Bug and guarantee is throwing the casual readers off the mark ?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: