Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The attorneys you buy, and the hours and angles they’re willing to explore for a single $16k payout is very different than the attorneys your insurance company buys for 50 $50k payouts.


Why are you putting so much faith in an idea that more attorneys will necessarily prevail? This seems in the neighborhood of the just world fallacy.

This article references an earlier event where a $500k house was destroyed - one and a half orders of magnitude larger - with the same legal outcome.

Is it that hard to believe that the state has excepted itself (and its agents) from legal liability?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: