Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Debian discussions make political discussions seem quick and fast acting by comparison

> He said that he uses cu ""almost constantly for interacting with embedded serial consoles on devices a USB connection away from my laptop""

Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

There are a million better ways of doing this.



I use GNU screen for that. Looking at cu, it looks to be just as tiny and has ssh-like tilda-escapes, including "~." to disconnect. Nice, gotta try it out, thanks!


I got used to using minicom way way back. Has a nice TUI and can do stuff.


I only moved to using screen about 2 years ago after over 2 decades of minicom


cu might be good for anything that you have a fixed config, otherwise I'll just go with minicom


What would you suggest? Personally I find cu the closest to ssh in ergonomics to any of the tui serial terminal programs, and it’s easily available across unixes like FreeBSD or Mac OS, which is a bonus.


cu is the regular way of doing it

I don't see the problem. Minicom and even picocom are bloated compared to cu


One comment [0] highlights a point in favor of the current implementation:

> create a lock file for every dial-in line to prevent its use by programs looking for a dial-out line.

[0]: https://lwn.net/Articles/1042594/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: