The author claims in the project README.md[0]:
I was working on something else and as a side effect accidently vibe coded a prolog interpretor on my phone over the weekend.
So there are two reasonable explanations:
A) There is no way to show prompts used when "vibe coding". B) This claim of "vibe coding" a Prolog is disingenuous.
0 - https://github.com/nlothian/Vibe-Prolog
As for the rest of the code, it could be. Are there any obvious patterns you have found to be LLM generated?
In any case, my point is that a typo probably does not have to use LLM to fix that single typo.
So you can use LLMs but it is probably not used for everything, for example this typo.
The author claims in the project README.md[0]:
And has yet to show any evidence of "vibe coding", to the point where I chose one of many commits challenging this position.So there are two reasonable explanations:
Which do you think is the case?0 - https://github.com/nlothian/Vibe-Prolog