Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Cyber attack that sent 750k malicious emails traced to hacked refrigerator (theage.com.au)
70 points by digisth on Jan 20, 2014 | hide | past | favorite | 31 comments


Show this headline to 1994 me, and he'd be wondering what kind of strange cyperpunk world we're all living in now.

2014 me sees this headline and thinks "Well duh. Of course the refrigerator got pwned."


Recently started thinking about everything I use, say, and do in my life in the context of the past.

A Jamaican bobsled team raised $25,000 via Dogecoin, a crypto-currency, based on a combination of bitcoin, the popular digital money, and Doge, the internet meme that superimposes broken English written in Comic Sans onto pictures of Shiba Inu dogs.

This is the future.


Is only just getting started. Is stuff like that that makes me sort of feel sorry for the surveillance guys. We only have to enjoy the culture, they have to try and make sense of it.


thank God, I'm only watching the game, controlling it


My girlfriend yelled at me today when the last chocolate pudding went missing. I calmly explained to her that fridge-oriented cyber-attacks are becoming more and more sophisticated.


I laughed at this, out loud, for about a minute straight.


"Honey, there's spam in the fridge again!"


This is why we don't need "smart" appliances. We need, by and large, appliances that are as dumb as a post, unless there is some compelling reason for them to be smart. Especially televisions. I want my TV to be "smart" like I want my Internet pipe to be smart, which is to say, not at all.


Security implications of technology is never a valid argument against furthering technology. Otherwise we wouldn't have the internet ;)

I'd love to have a fridge that could tell me its contents and give me a shopping list based on what I've recently cooked and what I have on hand and what's about ready to expire.


>Security implications of technology is never a valid argument against furthering technology.

Never? So you would accept an Internet-connected pacemaker without a second thought? There are clearly tradeoffs. Saying security should never overrule advancement seems a little extreme.


Security is just another branch of technology. I'd see nothing wrong with a pacemaker being IP-connected (though the logistics of how you'd do that escape me) as long as the remote side used proper authentication, multifactor, etc.


But why would you? An IP-addressable pacemaker serves what purpose, exactly?

Two-factor or not, you are introducing risk, complexity, and power consumption for what?


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/12/business/12heart-web.html?...

It says right there there are already Internet connected pacemakers.

>But device makers have begun designing them to connect to the Internet, which allows doctors to monitor patients from remote locations.

What's the benefit of wireless communication on pacemakers? Oh I don't know, how about having the ability to make a minor adjustment without having to go through a major surgery.


> Internet pipe to be smart, which is to say, not at all.

QoS can be quite useful, and your "pipe" needs some smarts in order to implement it.


Aww don't ruin my dream of the auto-fridge :( a fridge-stove combination that makes your supper for you.


Anything network-connected will probably eventually have some vulnerability discovered when it's out in the wild.

There's a business opportunity here: Anyone who makes a hardware device can pay a fee. In return they get to apply your company's branding to the hardware. They must submit their source code to you in escrow and provide you the keys to a remote update mechanism.

You promise to only look at the their source code if there's a security flaw in their device and they're unresponsive.

This way consumers still have some protection against insecure devices even when a manufacturer goes out of business or stops supporting a product line. You might want to include an expiration date on the branding ("Protected by SecureDevice until January 2018") to keep yourself from the unsustainable situation of providing unbounded support for a finite fee.

I was going to call this a "startup opportunity," but I think it'd work best for a company who's already convinced lots of vendors to pay a fee for a hardware certification (e.g. someone who certifies compliance with key standards, or an OS vendor like Microsoft / Apple)



Is there any real information about this? All I've seen is a press release with more marketing info than details.


So it wasn't fully traced then?

This is mostly just a Proofpoint advertisement.


Good job with the misleading HN title.


For context, the full title is: "Cyber attack that sent 750k malicious emails traced to hacked refrigerator, TVs and home routers"

And yes, "refrigerator" is (only known to be) singular.


There's an 80 character title limit on HN.


Then reword it to fit. As is it's not even close to accurate.


HN mods also enforce titles being the same as the original to reduce sensationalism and editorializing. Even if OP did reword it to fit, a mod would just change it back.


"Why we revert to original titles":

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6572466


It's only a matter of time until we have self-driving refrigerators /NBd


When the salesman said my fridge could "handle spam", he wasn't kidding!


Alright, now where's the Snowden leak describing how the NSA is tracking my meals?


When Ted Selker was at the MIT Media Lab, he directed an augmented reality smart kitchen project called "Counter Intelligence". http://web.media.mit.edu/~selker/ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=87D...

"ABSTRACT: The kitchen is a complex and dangerous multi-user work environment that can benefit from augmented reality techniques to help people cook more safely, easily and efficiently. We present Counter Intelligence, a conventional kitchen augmented with the projection of information onto its objects and surfaces to orient users, coordinate between multiple tasks and increase confidence in the system. Five discrete systems gather information from the kitchen and display information in an intuitive manner with special consideration for directing the user’s attention. This paper presents the design of these systems and results of initial evaluations."


Well, it makes sense. Many/most of these appliance devices are running Linux, because it's easy. Root one, install what you want, and because they're all identical it's easy to find and root many of them.


"HealthCare.gov taken down by virus infected Coffee Maker"

"Chinese Malware Infected Elmo takes down New York Power Grid"

"6 million spam gmail accounts linked back to internet connected 'smart pencil'"

"Northern Deep Freeze caused by hacked Nest Thermostats"

"Surge Protector accidentally leaks Confidential White House Emails"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: