Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hoytschermerhrn's commentslogin

This country literally had a civil war to prevent rich capitalists from owning other human beings. America’s “values” have always been rooted in profit-driven utilitarianism.


Are you a bot? Why respond to two comments with nearly exactly the same introductory paragraphs…


Because it's a relevant question to ask? Both replies addressed nothing I said and were in a haste to say what's on their mind vs. process what I wrote.


The new electric Volvos have LIDAR, proving that the technology has (at least now) approached mass-market feasibility.


A single car in US whose lidar is not operational yet and burns thru cameras? Wouldn’t call it success just yet.


Ummm, it is actually active with ADAS anywhere? Certainly not in the US.

>The EX90's LiDAR enhances ADAS features like collision mitigation and lane-keeping, which are active and assisting drivers. However, full autonomy (Level 3) is not yet available, as the Ride Pilot feature is still under development and not activated.


Somewhat surprisingly, they’ve also successfully diversified into high-end skincare, applying their chemical expertise to moisturizer forumulations and whatnot.


Film chemistry involves a lot of emulsions does it not?


Yes, exactly. Apparently the chemistry for film emulsion is very similar to what’s needed for skin applications. I think a lot of companies would not be so forward-thinking, so I give them a lot of credit here.


I don’t believe we have ticks in the same way that the east coast has lime disease-carrying ticks though?


As an old-home owner and a hobbyist woodworker, I can confirm that it’s not user error — old-growth timber really is that dense. Even my impact driver struggles to drill simple holes sometimes.


- Generally Available? Available?? Simply showing a checkmark???

- In Experimental? Coming soon??

Make it make sense.


You’ve posted a 3-paragraph rant on a baseless assumption for a product which hasn’t been released yet. Let’s all withhold judgement until we have more information about how this truly works.


V4 is baked into Bing Chat. I believe paid OpenAI accounts also have access.


It’s simply unrealistic for businesses to not exceed the $250k insurance limit.


Both insured sweep accounts and non-FDIC depository insurance exist.


You can buy insurance to protect amounts above $250k.


That just moves the source of risk to the company selling you that insurance. If they go under as well, then that insurance is worthless.


Which insurance company can pay out a $40bn risk event?


When Lehman Brothers collapsed, the associated insurance payouts totaled ~$100 billion.


Reinsurance literally exists for this purpose. It's what Berkshire Hathaway does, for example.


You can only reinsure so many times before you arrive in the central bank.


Lloyds of London?


Berkshire Hathaway could. They probably wouldn’t have insured SVB, though.


Exactly this, take out insurance, open additional accounts so that the companies livelihood is not dependent on a single bank. What about all the companies who funded all these 'companies' ? Why aren't they stepping in to clean up the mess?


And who ensures that the insurance company has enough capital to pay out on that insurance?


I had no idea that was an option. My google-fu is failing me, what is that called? Who are the providers? Seems like it would be a mega capital intensive insurance product.

edit: this is way out of my wheelhouse, so an actual answer would be educational.


The term to google for is "insured cash sweep", but the specifics depend on the particular financial institution you work with. Instead of a single insurance provider, your cash is sharded behind the scenes among many member institutions. Here's one bank I picked at random from Google[0]. Brokerages like Schwab[1] and IBKR[2] also have a private insurer (both use Lloyd's of London) they offer as a service to customers.

[0] https://www.stearnsbank.com/personal/high-balance-deposit

[1] https://www.schwab.com/legal/sipc-account-protection

[2] https://ibkr.info/node/2012


Thanks for pointing me to this!


Try searching for "reinsurance" as in insurance for insurance, Swiss Re and Lloyds of London are the two big names I can think of, I don't know much other than that.


We solved this problem decades ago, these businesses chose not to use the tools available to them to protect their money.

https://www.intrafinetworkdeposits.com/


It’s silly. Either way, the money’s coming from the insurance fund. FDIC claims insurance is “at least” 250k.


The point is that diversifying deposits across banks reduces the risk of failures happening in the first place, reducing FDIC payouts. This incentive structure completely breaks down if there's no cap.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: