> Just take their current flagship smartphone, double the thickness to fit a halfway-between-smartphone-and-full-frame sensor, an SD card slot, ability to export RAWs, and a compact zoom lens, and sell it for like $2000.

And no one will buy it. It has been tried before, by Nokia.

Yeah just like nobody would want a social network because MySpace and Friendster tried it. And nobody would want a tablet, Apple already tried that with the Newton.

Not saying you are wrong but “Nokia tried it” is not any kind of marker.

I was under the impression the Nokia that did this failed because it ran Windows Phone and not Android.

The rent-a-gym, I guess the west solves that by having gym equipment in a park? An interesting solution to a busy city.

Since this has a range of 4km, it requires a controller. There is now way to get that distance without one.

This is pretty good, 30 min flight time and 4km range.

> 4 km for FCC compliant Model (MT1SS5) and 2 km for CE compliant Model (MT1SD25).

No one is attacking json here.

> I'm a marathoner

Ok, but listening to music is cheating.

It isn't. And I only listen to music during training not races

Blackmailing a hitman might not be the best idea.

Of course they do. There is only reward and no downside to doing that. They save a few seconds, and no one is giving out tickets for doing this.

It is clearly not an article, it is question someone posed. Here is the answer.

Like Youtube, which lost money every year until it was bought by Google. Or Instagram? Or a variety of others.

You don't understand why people want to copy those models of growths and get those big payouts? Which part confuses you?