Yes. It's an analysis of the differences in results generated by different teams of academics researching the same data. That required lots of researchers, who all deserve credit for their contributions.
> We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty: non-standard errors. To study them, we let 164 teams test six hypotheses on the same sample.
I would really like to see collaborative software development done via a usenet newsgroup. The git send-email program could be updated to send cover letters and in line patches to a newsgroup, and people could reply to those messages and review each patch.
It's not a bad start, but it's missing "trolling/shitposting".
(I'm hardly advocating that people start relying on openai for moderation, rather it would be great if people started figuring out how to do this locally with the tools we have. Their bias against chess players is pretty despicable)
